← All episodes

Earth Commons: Gitcoin Grants Round 20

18th Jun 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro

Gitcoin and Quadratic Funding

Kevin Owocki, founder of Gitcoin, described the platform as a place to "get coins if you're working on important causes in the community." Gitcoin Grants Rounds are quarterly events where projects can register to receive contributions from both individual donors and a matching pool. A key innovation of Gitcoin is its use of quadratic funding, a mechanism designed to incentivize broader community support for projects.

Owocki explained that with quadratic funding, "When you give a dollar to a project...it can actually mean up to $100 or sometimes even $1,000 worth of support for that project." This is because matching funds are distributed based on the number of contributors to a project, rather than the total amount raised. This encourages a wider range of people to donate, knowing that their contributions will have a disproportionately large impact. Owocki highlighted the potential of quadratic funding to democratize philanthropy, stating that it allows "communities themselves" to guide the distribution of funds.

Community Rounds and Climate Action

John Ruth, a leader of the Climate Coordination Network (CCN), explained that CCN runs a community round within Gitcoin focused on funding climate action projects. He emphasized the importance of decentralization, noting that community rounds empower groups to "fund what matters to us." For CCN, this means "solving for climate change...using Web3 tools."

CCN has distributed over $4 million to climate projects globally, with a particular focus on regenerative finance (ReFi) initiatives. Ruth emphasized the importance of community signaling in determining fund allocation, explaining that projects which receive broader support, even if donations are small, are more likely to receive larger portions of the matching pool. This approach ensures that funding decisions are guided by community priorities.

"We're really looking for the signal from the community to tell us where these funds should go."

OpenCivics and Impact Attestation

Benjamin Leif described OpenCivics as a "decentralized organization...creating a solidarity network...amongst people who are innovating in the civic space." He highlighted the transformative potential of public goods, particularly in the context of "coordination and governance" and the "fundamental underlying principles" of society. OpenCivics aims to support projects that are using Web3 technologies to address these challenges.

Leif explained that OpenCivics' community round prioritizes funding a smaller number of projects with larger grants, ensuring that recipients have sufficient resources to make a meaningful impact. This approach also allows OpenCivics to experiment with "impact attestation frameworks" to track and measure the effectiveness of funded projects. This data can then be used to build a "ledger of impact" that can support projects in securing future funding.

Challenges and Opportunities in Web3 Funding

The panelists acknowledged the challenges associated with onboarding users and projects in the Web3 funding landscape, particularly for those unfamiliar with cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. Issues like user experience, accessibility of exchanges, and the need for technical knowledge were highlighted as barriers to broader participation. However, they emphasized the ongoing efforts to improve user experience and the development of more intuitive tools.

Owocki outlined his vision for scaling Gitcoin's software by embracing a "modular software development thesis," inspired by the Unix philosophy. This approach encourages the creation of interoperable tools that address specific needs within the broader ecosystem. He expressed his belief that enabling a wider range of developers to build specialized tools will ultimately lead to a more robust and user-friendly platform.

"The sort of vision for scaling out Gitcoin software is to follow a modular software development thesis...build software that does one thing well and is designed to be interoperable with other programs."

The Future of Funding and Decentralized Power

The conversation concluded with a broader discussion about the future of funding and the potential for Web3 technologies to create more democratic and decentralized power structures. The panelists explored the limitations of traditional philanthropy and the need for more agile and responsive funding mechanisms, particularly in the face of global challenges like climate change and social inequality.

Leif argued that the current moment necessitates a shift away from dependence on large institutions towards more community-driven solutions. He sees Web3 technologies as essential tools for facilitating this transition, enabling "groups of peers to coordinate together" and build more resilient systems.

Owocki emphasized the potential for blockchain technology to create more transparent and equitable systems of value exchange, stating that it allows anyone to "program their values into their money." He acknowledged the risks associated with this technology, particularly the potential for scams and abuse, but argued that these risks are outweighed by the transformative potential of decentralized systems.

"Blockchain is a way to build more transparent, efficient, global money and to allow anyone to program their values in their money."

The panelists expressed optimism about the future of Web3 funding, envisioning a future where these technologies empower communities to take control of their resources and build a more just and sustainable world.