18th Jun 2024 Gemini 1.5 Pro
Samantha Power, an ecological economist and nature finance specialist, began her journey with a traditional economics background. Experiencing the devastating impact of rainforest burning in Indonesia ignited a passion for policy change to protect the biosphere. This led her to the World Bank, where she worked for over five years, focusing on integrating ecological considerations into financial markets and decision-making. Her work centers on shifting financial flows to serve the preservation and regeneration of life on Earth.
Power's time at the World Bank provided insight into the institution's complex nature. She observed a disconnect between those advocating for environmental protection and those in finance. She viewed her role as a bridge builder, emphasizing the economic risks associated with ecological degradation to engage finance ministries and institutions.
And so for probably about seven years now, maybe, maybe a little bit longer, I've been in this inquiry, Matthew, of how do we change where money flows throughout society? And if we do that, can we change power? Can we change our relationship to the earth and how we interact with the earth through the economy?
Power acknowledges the limitations of top-down approaches like the Paris Agreement and the Kunming-Montreal Agreement. While recognizing their role in setting goals and inspiring collective action, she emphasizes the necessity of bottom-up approaches. Grassroots movements, particularly those led by Indigenous communities, are crucial for driving change and ensuring that financial resources reach those directly responsible for protecting and regenerating ecosystems.
Power believes a dual approach is necessary, combining the ambition of global agreements with the on-the-ground action of local communities. Indigenous communities, despite protecting the vast majority of the world's remaining biodiversity, receive a disproportionately small amount of climate finance. Bridging this gap and empowering local communities to manage and benefit from their natural resources is a key focus of Power's work.
Power delves into various financial instruments aimed at funding nature-based solutions. She highlights the limitations of focusing solely on carbon markets and the need to recognize the broader value of ecosystem services. Natural asset companies, for instance, seek to monetize the intrinsic value of nature, appealing to institutional investors by highlighting the systemic risks associated with ecological degradation.
Power's current focus lies in developing the concept of bioregional funds. These funds would operate at the bioregional level, aggregating external resources like grants and investments to support local regeneration projects.
And so I've been thinking through how we can bring these resources down so that they can be more in service to those people that have really small projects. And a concept that I've been working on with a couple of my collaborators, including the Buckminster Fuller Institute, is bioregional funds.
Power sees significant potential in Web3 technologies for decentralizing finance and empowering local communities. Platforms like Regen Network, which enable communities to establish their own protocols for assessing ecosystem health and issuing tokens, offer promising models. The transparency and accountability inherent in blockchain technology, combined with the ability to create bioregional currencies, could revolutionize how we value and finance regeneration.
Power emphasizes the importance of shifting away from traditional, top-down financial models towards more participatory and democratic systems. Web3 technologies can facilitate this shift by providing the tools for transparent governance, community ownership, and equitable distribution of resources. This includes exploring mechanisms for communities to govern bioregional funds, ensuring funds are allocated based on local needs and values.
Power criticizes the current overreliance on reductionist, quantitative metrics in assessing ecological health. She advocates for a more holistic approach that considers qualitative factors like well-being, resilience, and the strength of relationships within ecosystems and communities.
To be clear, I think there is still a huge role for metrics that can be quantitative. I think it's both and. It's like bringing together the masculine and the feminine.
Incorporating these qualitative metrics requires a shift in perspective and a willingness to embrace complexity. Power believes that empowering local communities to define what matters most in their bioregions is crucial. By listening to the needs of both human and non-human stakeholders, we can move beyond simplistic, market-driven solutions and cultivate truly regenerative practices.
Airtable